SB Nation Bay Area - NFL Draft Grades 2011: Evaluating Oakland Raiders, San Francisco 49ers Draft Pickshttps://cdn.vox-cdn.com/community_logos/48817/bayrea-fave.png2011-05-02T10:02:01-07:00http://bayarea.sbnation.com/rss/stream/19120332011-05-02T10:02:01-07:002011-05-02T10:02:01-07:002011 NFL Draft Grades: SB Nation Likes Both Raiders, 49ers Draft Picks
<figure>
<img alt="" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/G0-pRIY4kxr6Wb1r1m2g2LnKJCY=/0x26:400x293/1310x873/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/47828101/large_bayarea.sbnation.com.minimal.0.png" />
</figure>
<p>In an interesting twist, we now have a site that actually liked both the 49ers and the Raiders 2011 <span class="caps">NFL</span> Draft classes. As <span class="caps">NFL</span> Draft grades are unveiled, SB Nation has decided the Raiders warranted a B- and the 49ers warranted B. While we might prefer As for the two draft classes, all things considered I’d say those are fairly solid grades. Although, as I look back a second time, nobody in the <span class="caps">AFC</span> got a C so I suppose that should say something about the curve in place for that conference.</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong><a class="sbn-auto-link" href="http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/oakland-raiders">Oakland Raiders</a>: B-</strong><br>
Despite not having a first-round pick, the Raiders were able to add contributors to their team, including Stefen Wisniewski and Chimdi Chekwa. The team also added the top-level speed it annually covets in cornerback DeMarcus Van Dyke and running back Taiwan Jones, who could both turn out to be steals (though <span class="caps">DVD</span> was probably over-drafted by a round). Keep an eye on receiver Denarius Moore, as well, as he was creating serious buzz in scouting circles pre-draft.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I find it interesting that people seem to view Chimdi Chekwa as a greater value than Demarcus Van Dyke. It seems like the Raiders really liked Van Dyke’s upside, thus the reason for grabbing him earlier than they might have otherwise needed. All it takes is one other team liking the player, so maybe it is justifiable.</p>
<p>On the other side of the Bay, the 49ers get some love for the potential in their draft, even if it may take a little time to develop:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong><a class="sbn-auto-link" href="https://www.ninersnation.com/">San Francisco 49ers</a>: B</strong><br>
Aldon Smith managed to fly under the radar a bit pre-draft, but has loads of talent and could be the pass rusher that the 49ers thought they were getting in Manny Lawson. Colin Kaepernick, the team’s second-round pick, is perhaps the most intriguing developmental quarterback in this class, but it’ll be interesting to see how he adapts to West Coast Offense principles. Kendall Hunter was a terrific value pick on day three at running back, and seventh-round pick Bruce Miller has some upside as a rusher, as well.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I would argue Kendall Hunter could be one of their most immediate impact guys. He might not be unseating <span>Frank Gore</span> anytime soon, but he’ll have a good chance to take away from carries from Anthony Dixon.</p>
https://bayarea.sbnation.com/oakland-raiders/2011/5/2/2149459/2011-nfl-draft-grades-sb-nation-likes-both-raiders-49ers-draft-picksDavid Fucillo2011-05-02T07:00:46-07:002011-05-02T07:00:46-07:00NFL Draft Grades 2011: Gregg Rosenthal, Evan Silva Grade 49ers, Raiders Draft Classes
<figure>
<img alt="" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/G0-pRIY4kxr6Wb1r1m2g2LnKJCY=/0x26:400x293/1310x873/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/47828101/large_bayarea.sbnation.com.minimal.0.png" />
</figure>
<p>
<meta name="Title">
<meta name="Keywords">
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<meta content="Word.Document" name="ProgId">
<meta content="Microsoft Word 2008" name="Generator">
<meta content="Microsoft Word 2008" name="Originator">
<link href="file://localhost/Users/bigern22007/Library/Caches/TemporaryItems/msoclip/0/clip_filelist.xml" rel="File-List">
<style>
</style>
</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rotoworld.com/" target="_blank">Rotoworld.com</a>'s <a href="http://www.rotoworld.com/articles/nfl/37855/174/afc-draft-grades?pg=2" target="_blank">Greg Rosenthal</a> and <a href="http://www.rotoworld.com/articles/nfl/37849/174/draft-2011-nfc-grades?pg=2" target="_blank">Evan Silva</a> recently released their final draft grades for the 2011 NFL draft, giving both the <a class="sbn-auto-link" href="https://www.ninersnation.com/">San Francisco 49ers</a> and <a class="sbn-auto-link" href="http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/oakland-raiders">Oakland Raiders</a> decent marks. Let's take a look at what they had to say.</p>
<p>Silva on the 49ers:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><b>Pros:</b> It's hard not to like Jim Harbaugh's first draft. Contrary to some belief, [Aldon] Smith draws <a href="http://www.rotoworld.com/player/NFL/3170/DeMarcus-Ware"><b>DeMarcus Ware</b></a> comparisons for explosive disruptiveness and a freakish wingspan. He gives the 49ers a legitimate double-digit sack threat in year one. [Colin] Kaepernick is set up for success under quarterback guru Harbaugh.</p>
<p><b>Cons:</b> [Chris] Culliver has medical and character flags. [Ronald] Johnson is also brittle. [Curtis] Holcomb was a throwaway pick.</p>
<p><b>Grade:</b> B+ </p>
</blockquote>
<p>As for Holcomb, how many picks at the very end of the draft really come to fruition in the NFL anyway? Oh yea, Dwight Clark did, going 249th overall in the 1970 NFL draft. But I digress...</p>
<p>I agree that Smith can be a 'freakish' addition to the pass rushing core, and that Kaepernick is the QB of the future. Coach Harbaugh can grow alongside Kaepernick and hopefully will form a great kinship a la Bill Walsh (former Stanford Coach, first year 1979) and Joe Montana (the 82nd overall pick in the 1979 draft). Anyone else seeing history repeating itself?</p>
<p>Greg Rosenthal took care of the Raiders, here's how he broke the Silver & Black down: </p>
<blockquote>
<p><b>Pros: </b>They didn't have their first round pick, although the <a href="http://www.rotoworld.com/player/NFL/1134/Richard-Seymour"><b>Richard Seymour</b></a> has worked out well enough. [Taiwan] Jones saves this somewhat generic draft because he could be a steal and gives an improving Raiders offense another dimension.</p>
<p>
<meta charset="utf-8">
</p>
<p><b>Cons</b>: [Stefan] Wisniewski was a safe legacy pick, but lacks the high ceiling of his Pro Bowl uncle. [DeMarcus] Van Dyke was a backup in college, but at least the Raiders are now taking their track guys in the third round instead of earlier. <br> <b></b></p>
<p><b>Grade: </b>C</p>
</blockquote>
<p>True, the Raiders didn't do all that bad considering they were without that first round pick , but the fact that Seymour is brought up shows you how blasé Rosenthal must feel about this draft. Wisniewski could definitely be better than people think, but will obviously be compared to his uncle constantly. I think the Raiders did better than a C, but that's may be just me. </p>
https://bayarea.sbnation.com/oakland-raiders/2011/5/2/2148739/nfl-draft-grades-2011-gregg-rosenthal-evan-silva-grade-49ers-raidersErnie Pomin2011-05-02T06:00:53-07:002011-05-02T06:00:53-07:00NFL Draft Grades 2011: Rob Rang Gives 49ers, Raiders Marginal Marks
<figure>
<img alt="" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/G0-pRIY4kxr6Wb1r1m2g2LnKJCY=/0x26:400x293/1310x873/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/47828101/large_bayarea.sbnation.com.minimal.0.png" />
</figure>
<p>
<meta name="Title">
<meta name="Keywords">
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<meta content="Word.Document" name="ProgId">
<meta content="Microsoft Word 2008" name="Generator">
<meta content="Microsoft Word 2008" name="Originator">
<link href="file://localhost/Users/bigern22007/Library/Caches/TemporaryItems/msoclip/0/clip_filelist.xml" rel="File-List">
<style>
</style>
</p>
<p>Rob Rang of <a href="http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft" target="_blank">NFLDraftScout.com</a> knows his football. And when he comes up with his final grades for the 2011 NFL Draft, people listen. He recently released them on <a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=sportsxchange-000313987_final-nfl-draft-grades-and-analysis" target="_blank">Yahoosports.com</a>, giving both the <a class="sbn-auto-link" href="https://www.ninersnation.com/">San Francisco 49ers</a> and <a class="sbn-auto-link" href="http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/oakland-raiders">Oakland Raiders</a> marginal marks. Let's break down a bit of what he had to say about each team.</p>
<p>Rang gave the 49ers a C, mainly because he wasn't too fond of Aldon Smith as a first round pick:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I have my reservations about his potential in San Francisco's scheme. At 6-4, 263 pounds, [Aldon] Smith is already bigger than many 3-4 edge rushers and at only 20 years-old, he hasn't stopped growing. He's a bit stiff in the hips and I question how well he'll be able to turn the corner and close on the quarterback.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I thought being bigger was a good thing in the NFL? I haven't scouted Smith like Rang has, so maybe he has a point here. But we'll have to wait and see. As for quarterback Colin Kaepernick and running back Kendall Hunter, he is very fond of both of them, claiming Kaepernick is "a rare combination of size, arm strength and mobility for the position and is intelligent and hard-working."</p>
<p>As for Hunter, he's is Rang's favorite pick the Niners made, but admits he will likely not see much playing time barring injuries to <span>Frank Gore</span> or Anthony Dixon. Maybe he'll earn his way onto the field for some playing time, you never know. </p>
<p>When it came to Al Davis and the Raiders, Rang gave them a C+, claiming they were the "least surprising draft of the year:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Al Davis loves speed and his club drafted precisely that in cornerbacks <a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/24868/">Demarcus Van Dyke</a> and <a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/24900/">Chimdi Chekwa</a>,each of whom timed in the 4.3s at the combine. I love [Taiwan] Jones' open-field running ability, but with carries split already between <a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/8781/">Darren McFadden</a> and <a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/8354/">Michael Bush</a>, where is Jones going to get his touches?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The Raiders stick to their guns when it comes to the draft, and seemingly roll the dice to see what happens. I think they made some good picks, like Stefen Wisniewski, but I don't think Rang is as fond of him.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>this is the NFL, not a college fraternity, and legacies don't necessarily warrant a top 50 selection</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ouch. Important last name or not, I think Wisniewski is top 50 worthy, and the Raiders draft will turn out better than many think. It might take a year or two to develop, but there draft is higher quality that a C+ rating in my opinion.</p>
https://bayarea.sbnation.com/oakland-raiders/2011/5/2/2148718/nfl-draft-grades-2011-rob-rang-gives-49ers-raiders-marginal-marksErnie Pomin2011-05-02T04:30:26-07:002011-05-02T04:30:26-07:00NFL Draft Grades 2011: Mel Kiper, Todd McShay Relatively Positive About Raiders Draft Picks
<figure>
<img alt="" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/G0-pRIY4kxr6Wb1r1m2g2LnKJCY=/0x26:400x293/1310x873/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/47828101/large_bayarea.sbnation.com.minimal.0.png" />
</figure>
<p>It has become a bit of an annual tradition for so-called draft pundits to completely bash the <a class="sbn-auto-link" href="http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/oakland-raiders">Oakland Raiders</a> draft classes. Raiders fans hear the jokes about only picking speed guys and reaching for other talent. However, following the 2011 NFL Draft, ESPN's own draft pundits managed to avoid completely dogging the Raiders draft picks. They did not give them glowing praise, but all things considered it was positive.</p>
<p>I think Mel Kiper has <a href="http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft2011/insider/news/story?page=Kiper2011DraftGrades" target="_blank">resigned himself to the fact</a> that the Raiders like guys of whom he isn't necessarily fond. He pointed to the <a class="sbn-auto-link" href="http://www.sbnation.com/ncaa-football/players/37475/stefen-wisniewski">Stefen Wisniewski</a> pick as one people could see coming a mile away in part because when the Raiders find a guy they like, it doesn't really matter what other folks think of him. Consider it a sort of back-handed compliment. He was most positive about the offensive line as he views their choices there as a chance to fully implement the kind of offensive line Hue Jackson wants on his team.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>
<meta charset="utf-8">
You could see the pick of Wisniewski coming if you know Oakland's history. Stefen's uncle, Steve, was a great Raiders offensive lineman for 13 seasons. The pick itself came out as a slight reach on my board, but I know better than to say it was a bad reach, because Oakland consistently pick guys I have rated a little lower, but they often work out. Bottom line: it's not always about value with the Raiders, it's about getting their guy. Van Dyke makes sense as a Round 3 pick -- the Raiders need a corner with the likely departure of <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?playerId=4489">Nnamdi Asomugha</a> and Van Dyke is, of course, perhaps the fastest guy in the draft. The Raiders then again went offensive line and cornerback in repeat order. They upgraded their offensive line last year and had great results with Hue Jackson calling the plays, and it appears they wanted to finish the job in 2011. I was a little surprised they didn't address a clear need at outside linebacker a little earlier. They also waited until Round 5 to get a wideout, a spot I thought they might get to earlier. Another pretty good draft for the Raiders, who like their guys but don't worry as much about value.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><br><a href="http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft2011/news/story?id=6456201" target="_blank">Todd McShay was most intrigued</a> by their selection of wide receiver <a class="sbn-auto-link" href="http://www.sbnation.com/ncaa-football/players/10975/denarius-moore">Denarius Moore</a>. Given their potential 2010 draft day steal in <span>Jacoby Ford</span>, Moore could be a nice addition to the receiving corp. On the other hand, McShay panned the Raiders for their deal with the <a class="sbn-auto-link" href="https://www.patspulpit.com/">Patriots</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<b>Best move: The surprising wideout</b><br><a href="http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft/player/_/id/26369/denarius-moore">Denarius Moore</a> has deceptive speed and is an underrated playmaker. He doesn't have great timed speed, which goes against the Raiders' usual MO, but he is slippery and tracks the vertical pass very well. Moore grew on me and the more tape I watched, the more I liked him.</p>
<p><b>Most questionable: Getting exploited by the Patriots</b><br>The Raiders traded pick No. 219 and a second-round pick in 2012 to the Patriots for picks No. 92 (OT <a href="http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft/player/_/id/26144/joe-barksdale">Joe Barksdale</a>) and No. 125 (RB <a href="http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft/player/_/id/27390/taiwan-jones">Taiwan Jones</a>). This is typical Raiders, not having a feel for where players are coming off the board and then getting impatient and making bad deals. The Patriots have a habit of exploiting teams like this and there's a reason New England keeps making deals with Oakland. Basically, this became Barksdale for a second-round pick, and that is not appropriate draft behavior. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>
<meta charset="utf-8">
</p>
https://bayarea.sbnation.com/oakland-raiders/2011/5/2/2148849/nfl-draft-grades-2011-mel-kiper-todd-mcshay-positive-raiders-picksDavid Fucillo2011-05-02T04:00:56-07:002011-05-02T04:00:56-07:002011 NFL Draft Grades: Mel Kiper, Todd McShay Question Some Of 49ers Picks
<figure>
<img alt="" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/G0-pRIY4kxr6Wb1r1m2g2LnKJCY=/0x26:400x293/1310x873/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/47828101/large_bayarea.sbnation.com.minimal.0.png" />
</figure>
<p>Mel Kiper and Todd McShay spend much of the year doing battle over the viability of hundreds of potential NFL Draft picks. And of course, this year it capped off with the 2011 NFL Draft and the subsequent grades handed out by the two of them. While Kiper went with a traditional grading format, McShay went with a simple best move, questionable move system.</p>
<p>Kiper gave the 49ers a C+ in <a target="_blank" href="http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft2011/insider/news/story?page=Kiper2011DraftGrades">his overall assessment</a>, while grading them out at a B level for addressing needs and a C for getting value. In looking through Kiper's analysis, there is a bit of a common thread as he points to various picks as reaches or at least potential reaches. As many others have already stated, Kiper views the top two picks as reaches, which means it could be some time before we truly now how this draft class shakes out for the 49ers:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>
<meta charset="utf-8">
You'll hear Smith called the first big reach of Round 1, but he wouldn't have lasted long at all past the No. 7 slot where the Niners nabbed him. And beyond the obvious question at quarterback, an outside linebacker who can rush the quarterback was the biggest position of need for this team, and if Smith continues on his developmental path, he could be a star. Jim Harbaugh found a quarterback he can develop with Kaepernick in Round 2, but even with the run on quarterbacks, I saw that as a reach. There's a lot of development needed. San Fran did hit on other top needs at cornerback and wide receiver, and got decent value in Hunter for depth at running back. Kilgore also offers a little more depth at guard. It's all about what happens at quarterback in terms of how we judge the success of the 2011 49ers, but I judge this weekend as a relative success. It's just a small worry when your first two picks both have development requirements.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><br>In <a target="_blank" href="http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft2011/news/story?id=6456201">Todd McShay's assessment</a>, he thinks the best move they made was actually trading up to get Kaepernick. Kiper liked Kaepernick as well, but felt it was a bit of a reach. It seems like McShay is looking more at the bright side of things in assessing the pick. He did feel they reached though with their selection of CB <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/ncaa-football/players/10832/chris-culliver" class="sbn-auto-link">Chris Culliver</a> in the third round:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<b>Best move: Trading up to get <a href="http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft/player/_/id/26167/colin-kaepernick">Colin Kaepernick</a></b><br><a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile'playerId=8416">Alex Smith</a> is expected to be back for another year, but this gives coach Jim Harbaugh a quarterback to develop. Kaepernick needs work and is a long way away, but with the right coaching he could be one of the steals of this draft.</p>
<p><b>Most questionable move: Reaching at cornerback</b><br>The 49ers had a pretty good draft, but there were better options, including <a href="http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft/player/_/id/27042/shareece-wright">Shareece Wright</a>,<a href="http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft/player/_/id/26851/curtis-marsh">Curtis Marsh</a> and <a href="http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft/player/_/id/26266/johnny-patrick">Johnny Patrick</a>, available at cornerback than <a href="http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft/player/_/id/26110/chris-culliver">Chris Culliver</a> at the No. 80 slot. They addressed the pass rush but could have done a little better here at cornerback. Still, if this is the most questionable move they made, the 49ers had a pretty good draft.</p>
</blockquote>
https://bayarea.sbnation.com/oakland-raiders/2011/5/2/2148844/2011-nfl-draft-grades-mel-kiper-todd-mcshay-question-49ers-picksDavid Fucillo2011-05-01T22:57:43-07:002011-05-01T22:57:43-07:002011 NFL Draft Grades: NBC Sports Likes Taiwan Jones But Not Much Else In Oakland Raiders Draft
<figure>
<img alt="" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/G0-pRIY4kxr6Wb1r1m2g2LnKJCY=/0x26:400x293/1310x873/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/47828101/large_bayarea.sbnation.com.minimal.0.png" />
</figure>
<p><span class="caps">NBC</span> Sports has been rolling out their <a href="http://drafthq.nbcsports.com/team_picks.aspx" target="new">2011 <span class="caps">NFL</span> Draft grades</a> and it is safe to say they are not big fans of the <a class="sbn-auto-link" href="http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/oakland-raiders">Oakland Raiders</a> 2011 draft class. The Raiders lacked a first round pick because of the <span>Richard Seymour</span> trade so it makes it a little more difficult to fully assess their draft class. Seymour has been an excellent upgrade for the Raiders defensive line so one wonders how should be factored into their draft grade.</p>
<p><span class="caps">NBC</span> Sports think that the selection of Eastern Washington running back Taiwan Jones saves the class as a dynamic addition to the offense. The Raiders assigned a tender to restricted free agent <span>Michael Bush</span>, but if he were to walk in free agency Jones would likely see a whole lot more playing time. If that’s the case, maybe he really does become a savior for this draft class. Otherwise <span class="caps">NBC</span> Sports seems to view this as a fairly generic draft class:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>They didn’t have their first-round pick, though the Richard Seymour has worked out well. (We’d argue Seymour has been overpaid, but that’s another matter.) Stefan Wisniewski was a safe legacy pick, but lacks the high ceiling of his Pro Bowl uncle. DeMarcus Van Dyke was a backup in college, but at least the Raiders are now taking their track guys in the third round instead of earlier. Jones saves this somewhat generic draft because he could be a steal and gives an improving Raiders offense another dimension.</p>
</blockquote>
https://bayarea.sbnation.com/oakland-raiders/2011/5/1/2148779/2011-nfl-draft-grades-nbc-sports-likes-taiwan-jones-oakland-raiders-draft-classDavid Fucillo2011-05-01T22:33:27-07:002011-05-01T22:33:27-07:002011 NFL Draft Grades: NBC Sports Is A Big Fan Of 49ers Draft Class
<figure>
<img alt="" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/G0-pRIY4kxr6Wb1r1m2g2LnKJCY=/0x26:400x293/1310x873/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/47828101/large_bayarea.sbnation.com.minimal.0.png" />
</figure>
<p>In searching around the Internet for 2011 <span class="caps">NFL</span> Draft grades, a lot of <a class="sbn-auto-link" href="https://www.ninersnation.com/">49ers</a> grades have been in the C range. The media have liked certain aspects of the 49ers draft but the apparent developmental nature of the draft has left people questioning how to grade it right now.</p>
<p>That is not a problem for <a href="http://drafthq.nbcsports.com/team_picks.aspx" target="new"><span class="caps">NBC</span> Sports</a>. They gave the 49ers a B+ in part because they are big fans of Aldon Smith’s upside. They proclaimed that “Smith draws <span>DeMarcus Ware</span> comparisons for explosive disruptiveness and a freakish wingspan. He gives the 49ers a legitimate double-digit sack threat in year one.”</p>
<p>Additionally they think Kendall Hunter, Colin Jones, Bruce Miller, and Mike Person were all “noticeable value choices.” Of those four, Hunter and Miller would seem to be the two who might receive the most playing time in season one. Hunter will be battling Anthony Dixon for playing time behind <span>Frank Gore</span>, while Miller will be attempting to convert from a defensive lineman to fullback.</p>
https://bayarea.sbnation.com/oakland-raiders/2011/5/1/2148757/2011-nfl-draft-grades-nbc-sports-is-a-big-fan-of-49ers-draft-classDavid Fucillo2011-05-01T17:37:05-07:002011-05-01T17:37:05-07:002011 NFL Draft Grades: SBNBA Gives Raiders C Grade Due To Schizophrenic Draft Strategy
<figure>
<img alt="" src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/G0-pRIY4kxr6Wb1r1m2g2LnKJCY=/0x26:400x293/1310x873/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/47828101/large_bayarea.sbnation.com.minimal.0.png" />
</figure>
<p>The biggest thing to note about the <a class="sbn-auto-link" href="http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/teams/oakland-raiders">Oakland Raiders</a> draft is the fact that they didn't have a first round pick. As such, folks need to take that into account when making a grade for the team. You can't just look at the names drafted and say, for the lack of star power, that it was a bad haul, you have to grade on something not entirely unlike a curve. For instance, if you eliminate all of the first rounders from the teams that had them, how does the Oakland draft look in comparison? Let's list the picks and then we'll get to the official SB Nation Bay Area grade.</p>
<p><b>Oakland Raiders 2011 NFL Draft Selections</b></p>
<p>Round 2: <a class="sbn-auto-link" href="http://www.sbnation.com/ncaa-football/players/37475/stefen-wisniewski">Stefen Wisniewski</a>, C, Penn St. (48th overall)<br>Round 3: Demarcus Van Dyke, DB, Miami (81st overall)<br>Round 3: <a class="sbn-auto-link" href="http://www.sbnation.com/ncaa-football/players/10601/joseph-barksdale">Joseph Barksdale</a>, OL, LSU (92nd overall)<br>Round 4: <a class="sbn-auto-link" href="http://www.sbnation.com/ncaa-football/players/7195/chimdi-chekwa">Chimdi Chekwa</a>, CB, Ohio St. (113th overall)<br>Round 4: <a class="sbn-auto-link" href="#">Taiwan Jones</a>, RB, Eastern Washington (125th overall)<br>Round 5: <a class="sbn-auto-link" href="http://www.sbnation.com/ncaa-football/players/10975/denarius-moore">Denarius Moore</a>, WR, Tennessee (148th overall)<br>Round 6: <a class="sbn-auto-link" href="http://www.sbnation.com/ncaa-football/players/5212/richard-gordon">Richard Gordon</a>, TE, Miami (181st overall)<br>Round 7: David Aubsberry, WR, USC (241st overall)</p>
<p>Well, when you do happen to set out to grade this haul on a curve, it's still a little underwhelming. Wisniewski is a very solid pick who will contribute from day one, likely as the team's starting center in lieu of <span>Samson Satele</span>, who will likely be leaving in free agency. He's got good value and fills a big need, so there's plenty of points there. The biggest problem with the draft is Oakland's propensity to draft guys based on speed and athleticism and not much else. It's not that Demarcus Van Dyke is a bad pick, it's just the fact that he was a backup at Miami and there were still multiple corners on the board who project as better players in the NFL. It makes even less sense when you see that the best corners in the NFL today aren't guys that are burners on the back-end, including Oakland's own <span>Nnamdi Asomugha</span>, who could be departing the team in free agency before the 2011 season.</p>
<p>In fact, Chimdi Chekwa in the fourth round is the perfect example of what the Raiders should be doing with their draft picks. He's a corner with good speed and athleticism who actually makes plays and has a lot of upside, much more than Van Dyke, who was picked almost exclusively for the fact that he ran a 4.28 40-yard dash. Their late round selections don't project to do much, but Richard Gordon out of Miami could use his athleticism to become a reliable target in the NFL, but he wasn't thrown to a lot in college. With Zach Miller potentially leaving for free agency, one would think the team might address the position earlier on.</p>
<p>For positives, Taiwan Jones is a vintage Raider pick, but one that has a ton of upside and has what you'd call "boom" potential. In the fourth round, you're looking at solid value for a guy who brings a different dynamic to any offense with limited bust factor. Joseph Barksdale is also a very strong pick in the third round, and adds to an Oakland offensive line that could take a big hit in free agency. At least they know how to draft those linemen, or at least they appear to. It's a case of "smart pick, not-so-smart pick, smart pick, not-so-smart pick."</p>
<p><b>Value: D+, Need: B, Overall: C</b></p>
https://bayarea.sbnation.com/oakland-raiders/2011/5/1/2148216/2011-nfl-draft-grades-sbnba-gives-raiders-c-grade-due-to-schiophrenic-draft-strategyJames Brady